... Seems bleak. People are leaving, left right and centre, for various reasons but it seems primarily due to issues with moderation and ownership ( link , link , link ).
The amount of PDP going on here is trivial.
The amount of directed academic work seems to be similarly low (only one response to a question about who uses blogs for academic work – there are examples, but I’m sorry Submitting essays via blogs is a bizarre use of the medium).
We may have 3192 blogs, and lots of entries (~150/day) but probably less than 15% of those blogs are really being used (link). The presupmtion seems to have been “make the tool, advertise it, and it’ll be a success”. Has WB been a success? Really? for a few people (such as myself) who don’t really write anything close to the edge, the issues with moderation are lessened, but I don’t like being so strongly tied to the university. In common with most bloggers here, almost nothing that I post is directly relevent to my uni life.
Rob O’Toole recently presented at a conference some of the ‘key characteristics of the “blog phenomena”’ (all emphasis mine):
- A blog is a personal website, it has an ‘owner’;
- But it is much more – the extension of the owners mind and life onto the web – journaling;
- An extension of their personal identity;
- But also a way of trying out different identities;
- A sandbox or demilitarized zone;
- A place for reporting experiences;
- A place for making sense of experiences, or not as is sometimes the case;
- A place for just recording experience (a “bucket”);
- A place for defining what is important;
- A place for combining disparate experiences;
- A place for expressing ideas and opinions about the world;
- A place for testing out theories;
- Develops ideas and themes over time;
- A way of developing writing and communication skills;
- Not necessarily serious or authoritative;
- Sometimes quite scurrilous, close to the edge of the acceptable;
- Dynamic and changing;
- Snapshots of points in time;
- Ephemeral (but archived);
- Public and private;
- Networking – a means for advertising oneself and seeking like-minded friends;
- A place for developing or criticising each other’s ideas;
- Democratic;
- A simple but powerful tool that anyone can master.
My emphasis is on those statements that may be true of blogs in general (and I don’t agree with all of them), but are not true for WB. And these are some of the most important concepts of blogging, on the net in general.
I like WB. I like the way that everyone here is from the same environment. But I’m not sure it’s either fulfilling the role that “normal” blogs fulful, nor is it fulfilling the lofty goals in terms of helping with PDP (link). In fact, it seems necessary to persuade people of the value of PDP fullstop. The question has never been answered as to why someone should want to use a blog to do personal reflection.
So I don’t know what the future for WB is. I shall continue along here for the time being, but I’ve got my own separate site with duplicate posts on it. I’m going to start linking to each post there from here, to help with the google rating.